ChicagoLegalNet.com   

Sponsored by:

DONALD W. FOHRMAN & ASSOCIATES, LTD.                 Translate This Site

Experienced, Aggressive, Illinois Workers' Compensation & Personal Injury Attorneys
 

24 HOUR INJURY
HELPLINE.

800-437-2571

 

 

Rapid Response
(within 24 hours)

FREE,
No Obligation consultation with one of our experienced attorneys
Call 1-800-437-2571
 or
 complete the form below:

 

Name  
 Phone  
E-mail  

Best Time to Call:

Please describe your situation.
 

Activate this request by
typing the letters
"456"
 in the following box.
 

Privacy Policy

No information provided on this site will be divulged to any other person, firm or corporation except in the furtherance of services that you have requested.

 

 
  MAIN INDEX  
HOME  PAGE
Workers' Compensation

Legal Headlines

About Us

Do I Need an Attorney?

Working Women

United Airline Employees

Union Members

  Contact Us  

What is the $ value of my claim?

Do I Have a Case?

Ask a Legal Question

Second Opinion

Write Us

Bring a Friend Here

  Legal Information  

Workers' Compensation

Carpal Tunnel Syndrome

Overtime Wage Claims

Employment Discrimination

Retaliatory Discharge

Sexual Discrimination

Family Medical Leave Act

Social Security

Personal Injury

Third Party Cases

Auto Accidents

Nursing Home Abuse

Dog Bite

Slip & Fall

Railroad Accidents

Maritime Accidents

Truck Accidents

Products Liability

Pedestrian Accidents

Motorcycle Accidents

Dram Shop

Statute of Limitations

  General Info  
Free Printed Materials

Legal Update

Medical Update

Significant Workers'
Compensation  Decisions

Risk Free Representation

  Office Locations  

Donald W. Fohrman & Associates, Ltd has offices in Cook, Lake & DuPage counties.

We will also make arrangements to meet clients who reside in the Rockford, Elgin & Joliet areas

.COOK COUNTY OFFICE
101 W. Grand Avenue
Suite 500
Chicago, IL 60610

DUPAGE
COUNTY OFFICE
One Tower Ln.
Suite 1700
Oakbrook Terrace, IL 60181

LAKE COUNTY OFFICE
2275 Half Day Rd.
Suite 350
Bannockburn, IL 60015

Click here for directions
to our office

WARNING

Do not settle your Workers' Compensation or Personal Injury claim or walk-away from a claim because the insurance company  or their doctor has denied your claim without first contacting our office!
Call NOW

800-437-2571

Copyright © 1998
Donald W. Fohrman Ltd.
All rights reserved.
Revised: July 07, 2008.
For information concerning this site please contact :
Webmaster: 
www.websiteadvertising.com
E-mail: Info@websiteadvertising.com
Voice 1-847-446-2774
Northfield, Illinois

 

Recent significant developments in sexual harassment laws

Oncale v. Sundowner

Faragher v. Boca Raton

Ellerth v. Burlington Industries

In 1986, the U.S. Supreme Court first in Vinson v. Meriton Savings Bank declared that sexual harassment can be illegal sexual discrimination under Title VII of the 1964 Civil Rights Act. The court held that sexual harassment is illegal when the workplace is permeated with "discriminatory intimidation, ridicule and insult" that changes the conditions of the victims' employment and creates an abusive working environment. Beyond that, however, the court gave little guidance to lower courts to sort through the myriad of issues involved in sexual harassment.

Before the present term, the U.S. Supreme Court had issued just two major decisions on workplace sexual harassment. As a result, there has been a tremendous amount of litigation on sexual harassment issued with differing approaches and views on these issues in a number of lower courts.

It is expected that, with the Supreme Court hearing four significant sexual harassment cases this term, the justices will be able to provide sufficient guidance so that employees and employers will know what their rights and duties are and resolve the splits amount the lower courts.

The first of these cases was decided on March 4, 1998 when the Supreme Court ruled that same-sex harassment can violate Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Oncale v. Sundowner)

In the second case, argued on March 25, 1998, the Supreme Court will determine to what extent employers are liable for harassment to which top management has not been explicitly alerted (Faragher v. Boca Raton)

In the third case, also argued March 25, 1998, the Supreme Court will be deciding a related issue posed in the Faragher case; Should a school district be held liable for a teacher's sexual harassment of a student, if the district had no actual knowledge of the teacher's conduct.

The fourth case, argued in April, 1998, will be asking the Supreme Court to determine if mere threats, without adverse economic consequences or actual retribution, can support an action for quid pro quo sexual harassment. (Ellerth v. Burlington Industries)

Sexual Harassment Home Page

Evolution of Sexual Harassment Laws

Selected Sexual Harassment Jury Verdicts and Settlements

Frequently Asked Questions About Sexual Harassment